Grasim
Industries (NSE: GRASIM) surged over 4.5% after reporting strong Q4 FY26
results and announcing a ₹2,880 crore equity investment in Aditya Birla Capital
(ABCL). The development strengthens the company's strategic focus on India's
rapidly expanding financial services sector.
The
investment raises Grasim's stake in ABCL to 53.08%, increasing exposure to a
business with a ₹2 lakh crore lending book and nearly 30% CAGR growth over the
last three years.
While the news supports the bullish outlook, Elliott Wave Theory views it as a catalyst for an existing trend. This analysis examines Grasim’s position within its broader Elliott Wave structure, key support and resistance levels, and the most likely path for its next move.
![]() |
| Figure 1 |
A quick glance at Grasim Industries' long-term
chart reveals one of the strongest secular bull markets in the Indian stock
market. The stock's remarkable journey from double-digit prices to above ₹3,000
is far from random; it reflects decades of sustained business growth,
institutional accumulation, and unwavering investor confidence. More
importantly, every major correction along the way was followed by a recovery
that surpassed the previous peak—a defining characteristic of a primary bull
trend. Rather than a stock struggling to regain lost ground, Grasim has
consistently created wealth through a powerful sequence of higher highs and
higher lows for more than two decades.
From an Elliott Wave perspective, the current advance appears to be part of a much larger impulsive structure, suggesting that the long-term uptrend remains intact and that the market may still be building towards its next significant phase.
![]() |
| Figure 2 |
A review of Grasim Industries'
monthly chart reveals a classic Elliott Wave Leading Diagonal in its early
price history, with waves A, B, C, D, and E clearly identifiable within trendlines.
Studying such historical structures is crucial because they often form the
foundation of the entire wave count. By identifying this pattern, we establish
the starting point for the broader Elliott Wave analysis, providing the context
needed to interpret the stock's current position and wave development across
lower timeframes. While this formation has no direct bearing on today's trading
setup, it serves as an important reference point in understanding Grasim's
long-term market structure.
![]() |
| Figure 3 |
As Elliott Wave practitioners
know, a leading diagonal always appears in a first wave position. If the
structure identified on Grasim's long-term chart is indeed a leading diagonal, then the subsequent decline can be interpreted as the corrective second wave. In
the chart above, both Wave (1) and Wave (2) have been clearly identified and
labelled. Once a valid first and second wave sequence is established, the next
advance is expected to unfold as Wave (3), typically the strongest and most
dynamic phase of the trend.
However, we cannot simply
assume that Wave (3) has been completed. To validate this count, the rally from
the Wave (2) low must itself subdivide into a complete five-sub-wave
structure. Only if sub-waves (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) can be clearly
identified can we confidently conclude that Wave (3) is complete and that
the market has progressed to the next stage of the Elliott Wave sequence.
![]() |
| Figure 4 |
To gain a clearer perspective, we can zoom into a
lower timeframe and examine the internal structure of the proposed Wave (3).
Doing so reveals that sub-waves (1), (2), (3), and (4) appear to have already
formed, while the final sub-wave (5) is still developing. At this stage, it
would be premature to declare Wave (5) complete, as further analysis is required.
One important clue comes from the RSI indicator. Fifth waves are often accompanied by momentum divergence, and the chart already shows a clear bearish divergence, with price making higher highs while RSI fails to confirm the move. This suggests that the final phase of the advance is underway. However, the divergence alone does not confirm completion. Instead, it indicates that the fifth wave may still require additional development before the entire five-wave structure can be considered complete. In the next chart, we will examine the current position of this fifth sub-wave and assess how much of the pattern may still be left to unfold.
![]() |
| Figure 5 |
The chart above zooms into the internal structure
of the developing fifth sub-wave. A closer examination shows that it began with
a Leading Diagonal, a pattern that typically forms in a first-wave position.
This was followed by a complex corrective Wave (2), completing the initial
first-and-second wave sequence within the fifth sub-wave. As a result, the
market now appears to be advancing in Wave (3) of this smaller-degree
structure. The next step is to analyse the internal subdivisions of this
developing third wave to determine its current position and likely path
forward, as shown in the following chart.
![]() |
| Figure 6 |
A
deeper internal wave count of the fifth sub-wave reveals that Wave (I) unfolded
as a Leading Diagonal, followed by a complex corrective Wave (II). The
subsequent advance appears to be developing as Wave (III), which has already
reached a key Fibonacci resistance zone between the 100% and 110% extension
levels. However, it is still too early to confirm whether this third wave has
completed or is only in its early stages. To make that determination, we must analyse
its internal subdivisions in greater detail. The next chart will help us assess
the structure of this advance and determine the true position of Wave (III)
within the ongoing Elliott Wave sequence.
![]() |
| Figure 7 |
![]() |
| Figure 8 |
The alternative wave count shown above suggests that the fifth sub-wave within Wave (3) may be unfolding as an Ending Diagonal. Under this interpretation, the pattern is still incomplete, with waves D and E yet to develop. If this scenario proves correct, the stock could first experience a corrective decline to form wave D before resuming its advance toward wave E and completing the larger Wave (3) structure.
It is important to remember that this is only an alternative Elliott Wave scenario, not a forecast with certainty. Elliott Wave analysis deals with probabilities rather than guarantees, and no wave count can be considered definitive until confirmed by future price action. Therefore, both the primary and alternative counts should be monitored as the structure continues to evolve.
Disclaimer:
I am not a SEBI-registered financial advisor. The analysis and views shared
here are purely for educational and informational purposes and should not be
considered as financial advice or investment recommendations. Trading and
investing in the stock market carry a high level of risk, and past performance
is not indicative of future results. Readers are strongly encouraged to consult
with a certified financial advisor or SEBI-registered professional before
making any financial decisions. I am not responsible for any losses incurred
based on the information provided.







